• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù > ICFICE > ICFICE 2018

ICFICE 2018

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) Comparison of SVM and RF Classifiers for Stress and Fatigue Recognition
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Comparison of SVM and RF Classifiers for Stress and Fatigue Recognition
ÀúÀÚ(Author) Su-Jin Seong   Seong-Jae Park   Tae-Ho Park   Chang-Uk Shin   Da-Sol Park   Jeong-MooKim   Jeong-Won Cha   Yungi Park   Yongsoo Park   Youn-Sung Lee   Jeongwook Seo  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 10 NO. 01 PP. 0257 ~ 0259 (2018. 06)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
If the stress and fatigue in industrial workers becomes high when they are doing work, this may lead to a decrease in productivity and industrial accidents. In order to prevent the decrease in productivity and industrial accidents, this paper presents a stress and fatigue recognition (SFR) system. The proposed SFR system collects the biosignal and environmental data related to an industrial worker through an one-M2M compliant platform and then it classifies three states of industrial workers: working, stress and fatigue by using the collected data. For the classification of the states, we exploited Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms and compared their accuracy performances. Experimental results showed that the SVM classifier achieved 89% accuracy and the RF classifier achieved 98% accuracy.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) respiratory diseases   SVM   Random forest   DNN   Ensemble   Fatigue   Industrial IoT   Random Forest   Recognition   Stress   SVM  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå